Democratic presidential candidate speech praises “everything that is bad about Israeli policy and U.S. imperialism

Palestinian and human rights advocates were aghast over remarks made
by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at the annual
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) convention on Monday,
saying that her speech represented “everything that is bad” with U.S.
imperialism and policy in the Middle East.

During the address, Clinton vowed to take the U.S.-Israel relationship to “the next level”—a level which seemingly includes more war and imperialism, few, if any, rights for Palestinians, and definitely no economic boycotts of Israel.

“Has even one single Clinton supporter denounced the disgusting speech she gave today?”
—Glenn GreenwaldStriking a hawkish
tone, Clinton warned the powerful lobby group against rival candidates
who want to “outsource Middle East security to dictators” and “cede the
mantle of leadership for global peace and security,” and instead vowed
even more “security and intelligence cooperation.”

“As president, I will make a firm commitment to ensure Israel
maintains its qualitative military edge,” she said. “The United States
should provide Israel with the most sophisticated defense technology so
it can deter and stop any threats. That includes bolstering Israeli
missile defenses with new systems like the Arrow Three and David’s
Sling. And we should work together to develop better tunnel detection,
technology to prevent armed smuggling, kidnapping and terrorist
attacks.”

As observers noted, as she ran down the list of “evolving threats,”
the former U.S. secretary of state resorted to common neoconservative
talking points, declaring:

As we gather here, three evolving threats — Iran’s
continued aggression, a rising tide of extremism across a wide arc of
instability, and the growing effort to de-legitimize Israel on the world
stage — are converging to make the U.S.-Israel alliance more
indispensable than ever.

We have to combat all these trends with even more intense security
and diplomatic cooperation. The United States and Israel must be closer
than ever, stronger than ever and more determined than ever to prevail
against our common adversaries and to advance our shared values.

Touting her “deep, personal commitment” to the “Jewish state,”
Clinton then said that “one of the first things I’ll do in office is
invite Israeli Prime Minister [Benjamin Netanyahu] to visit the White
House.”

The speech proved that, on matters of Israel, Clinton is “running to the right” of GOP front-runner Donald Trump, as noted by Mondoweiss‘
Philip Weiss, who wrote that the remarks were “filled with red meat for
Israel supporters” and “contained scant reference to the peace
process.”

Later, Clinton doubled down on her previous pledge to dismantle the growing international Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement,
linking the campaign against Palestinian apartheid to anti-Semitism,
saying “we must repudiate all efforts to malign, isolate and undermine
Israel and the Jewish people.”

“I’ve been sounding the alarm for a while now,” Clinton continued.
“As I wrote last year in a letter to the heads of major American Jewish
organizations, we have to be united in fighting back against BDS.”

Read more at Common Dreams