Here is an amazing post by Mark Perry at Foreign Policy
blasting Obama’s deal with Netanyahu for a settlement freeze extension
as a gutless concession of power. Even Petraeus is afraid of the Israel
lobby, which dominates Establishment attitudes, Perry says, and he
honorably cites the killing of Furkan Dogan on the Mavi Marmara as
evidence of American subjection to Israeli interests. This is a new
level of criticism of the Israel lobby, at Foreign Policy no less, as
compromising Beltway culture; and why I’ve always said that Walt and
Mearsheimer merely scratched the surface. And why Lincoln’s attack on
the two-party “conspiracy” of the slave power in our politics should be
echoed today by criticism of the two-party agreement on blind support
for Israel. I would note that Lincoln included Supreme Court Chief
Justice Roger Taney in that conspiracy– and that Perry goes after Elena
Kagan:

If only Jefferson could see us now. This weekend, the
Obama administration promised to turn over $3 billion in stealth
fighters to Israel (supplementing the 20 F-35s it will buy with the
$2.75 billion in “grants” it gets from Washington) and veto any U.N.
resolution that questions Israel’s legitimacy — all in exchange for
Israel’s pledge to extend a ten-month partial settlement moratorium for
another 90 days. This is a bad idea. And it’s dangerous. There are
differences, of course, between the events of the last 24 hours and the
crisis that Jefferson faced in 1804. Then, we protested that we were “paying tribute,” now we are “providing incentives.” Then too, Israel is not making any “demands,” they are simply (in Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s words) “insisting.”
Oh — and let’s not forget — the pirates of Barbary were America’s
“enemy.” That’s a lot different than now; Israel is our “friend.”

This
administration’s decision would be shocking were it not so predictable.
Back on October 20, State Department spokesman Andrew Shapiro reassured
the press that a $60 billion U.S. arms transfer to Saudi Arabia would
go forward because “Israel does not object…”

The
tone-deafness evidenced by Andrew Shapiro is now an all-consuming part
of public policy, extending to every part of the American government —
and beyond. When Elena Kagan testified during her confirmation hearings
for the Supreme Court, she cited Israel jurist Aharon Barak as her
model, because he was the “John Marshall of the State of Israel.” Kagan
might well be a brilliant justice, but I would have thought she would
cite Marshall as her model. Reminded that Barak was a judicial activist
(and therefore not necessarily acceptable for some committee members),
Kagan gave a ready explanation: “Israel means a lot to me,” she
explained. Enough said. When David Petreaus was criticized by Israel
advocates for his March testimony, he backtracked, asking
neo-conservative Max Boot (in an email he carelessly sent to a blogger)
whether it would help “if folks know that I hosted Elie Wiesel and his
wife at our quarters last Sun night?” Petreaus is our nation’s most
influential military officer since Eisenhower. Guess what? He’s afraid
of Israel’s lobby. And when Angela Merkel addressed the U.S. Congress in
November of 2009, she didn’t talk about American security, but Israeli
security. “Security for the state of Israel is, for me, non-negotiable,”
she said. “Whoever threatens Israel also threatens us.” Even senior
aides to the otherwise pro-Israel Congress were puzzled.  “Maybe she
thought she was talking to the Knesset,” one of them said. Finally,
Republican Eric Cantor recently told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu that the new Republican majority would serve as “a check on
the administration” in any dispute with Israel — a statement so
astonishing that one pro-Israel journalist viewed it as not only
unprecedented, but “extraordinary.”

None of this has been lost on
the administration, which is apparently intent on proving to Cantor (and
the new Republican majority) that it’s as committed to Israel as they
are. Or more. On October 25, Dennis Ross, the White House point person
on the Middle East, told a meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee that not only is America committed “to Israel’s security”,
but that the U.S. commitment “has also been demonstrated in our work to
defeat efforts in international organizations to single out or
delegitimize Israel.”…

The message to American citizens is clear: if a Muslim kills you it’s because he’s a terrorist, if an Israeli kills you, [Furkan Dogan, American-Turk killed on Mavi Marmara] it’s because
you’re a terrorist. The Obama Administration’s newest promise to
Israel is abject, embarrassing and gutless. Our country — our president
— is rewarding a foreign leader who openly boasts that America “is
something that can easily be moved,” who urges a waiting game with the
U.S. because he knows that Israel’s friends in the Congress will defy a
president who opposes him, who tells his cabinet that he will outfox
Barack Obama. We are paying Israel to do something that is in their own
interests — and very much not in ours. That’s extortion. The Obama
Administration has this dangerously wrong. F-35s? This is not a
defensive weapon. The jet is the most advanced air system in the world,
with a round-trip capability that puts Tehran in range of Tel Aviv.