A nonprofit group that has shipped out 28-million copies of a
controversial film on radical Islam refuses to reveal the source of its
funding, but numerous ties connect it to a well-known Jewish education
group that vehemently denies any involvement with the film.
The backing for Obsession: Radical Islam’s War with the West
and the intent of its distributor, the Clarion Fund, has been the
subject of speculation since the DVDs were distributed beginning Sept.
14.
Clarion Fund, which was incorporated in 2006, distributed Obsession
in 14 states, including the key presidential battlegrounds of Florida,
Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The DVDs were distributed by mail and
as an advertising supplement in 58 Sunday newspapers, including the St. Petersburg Times.
“We
don’t have to say who its directors are or give financial information
until Nov. 6, 2008,” said Clarion spokesperson Gregory Ross.
Not
good enough, says the Council on American Islamic Relations, which
filed a complaint Tuesday with the Federal Election Commission.
“American
voters deserve to know whether they are targets of a
multimillion-dollar campaign funded and directed by a foreign group
seeking to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria as a way to influence the
outcome of our presidential election,” Nihad Awad, executive director
of CAIR, said in a statement.
There are a number of connections
between the Clarion Fund and a well-known organization called Aish
HaTorah, an international charity founded in Israel in the 1970s.
Ronn Torossian, spokesman for Aish HaTorah, said that his group would in “no way be involved with Clarion Fund or Obsession because Aish HaTorah is a charity and must remain apolitical.”
Ross,
the Clarion spokesman, was listed as an Aish HaTorah international
fundraiser on a federal election donation form in June 2007.
Elke Bronstein is the name written on the mail permit for the bulk mailing of Obsession
DVDs in mid September from Freeport, N.Y. Reached on her cell phone,
Bronstein said she worked for Clarion, but would not provide more
information.
The receptionist at Aish HaTorah in New York said
Bronstein worked for Aish Discovery, which produces high-tech programs
and films for Aish HaTorah. Torossian said Bronstein could easily have
separate jobs.
“What? You’re going to find four, five or six
people who work for Clarion and Aish and claim a worldwide conspiracy?
I don’t think so,” he said.
Clarion’s address, according to
Manhattan directory assistance, is the same address as Aish HaTorah
International, a fundraising arm of Aish HaTorah. The Clarion Fund and
Aish HaTorah International are also connected to a group called
HonestReporting, which produced Obsession. HonestReporting’s 2006 tax return uses the same address.
“It’s news to me,” Torossian said.
Two
of the three Clarion Fund directors at the time of its incorporation in
November 2006 appeared as Aish employees on Aish Web sites at the same
time. The third appeared on the Aish executive committee. Torossian
said the overlap meant nothing.
Aish HaTorah’s main purpose is to
“broaden the knowledge of individuals to their Jewish heritage.”
Barbara Walters, Steven Spielberg and Bill Clinton have praised the
charity.
A June 15, 2001, article in the Jerusalem Post
said that Aish HaTorah provided $150,000 in “seed money” to create an
organization called Media Watch International that took over
HonestReporting, the group that made Obsession four years later.
“This is true,” said Torossian, “but that association ended” before Obsession was made.
The
Aish Web site offers information on Jewish heritage and religious
issues, as well as links to numerous videos on Mideast politics. One of
the links is to Obsession.
“Aish also tells about a woman meeting Paul McCartney. Does that mean we’re connected to him?” Torossian asked.
Washington
tax attorney Marc Owens, who was IRS director of the Exempt
Organizations Division for 10 years, says that if IRS investigates and
finds a link between the film and Aish, it will ask: Was the film
designed or distributed to have an impact on the election? Is this film
an inflammatory hate message instead of a charitable, educational
message?
“If the answer is ‘yes’ to either question,” said Owens, “the involved charities could lose their tax-exempt status.”
Despite a disclaimer by the filmmakers that Obsession does not represent all Muslims, the 2005 film has been criticized for unfairly portraying the religion as violent.
In
the film, men in traditional Middle Eastern dress burn an American
flag. The planes fly into the twin towers. Peaceful scenes of Muslims
at market and prayer are interspersed with violent scenes and
commentators critical of Islam.
Clarion disputes there is any
political motivation for distributing the film now. However, about a
week ago, a Clarion Web site linked the film to the presidential
candidates.
“McCain’s policies seek to confront radical Islamic
extremism and terrorism and roll it back while Obama’s, although
intending to do the same, could make it worse,” said the site. This
statement was later removed.
“We are not telling people who to
vote for,” Ross, the Clarion spokesman, said in an Associated Press
story. “We’re just saying no matter who gets in office, the American
people should know radical Islam is a real threat to America.”
It
is not clear who paid for the extensive mailing of the DVD from
Freeport, N.Y. The permit number belongs to Clarion Fund, but Clarion
Fund had no money in its bulk-mail account, according to postal
administrators.
“The bulk mailing of this was made possible by a
third party, other than Clarion,” said U.S. Postal Inspector Debbie
Waller. “We’re looking into it.”
Contact Meg Laughlin at mlaughlin@sptimes.com.