- Details
-
Written by Seth Freedman, guardian.co.uk Seth Freedman, guardian.co.uk
-
Category: News News
-
Published: 11 August 2009 11 August 2009
-
Last Updated: 11 August 2009 11 August 2009
-
Created: 11 August 2009 11 August 2009
-
Hits: 3476 3476
Three out of four Israeli citizens of Russian extraction support the
transfer of Arabs out of Israel – and sadly they are not alone
Well over a million of Israel's population come from the former Soviet
Union (FSU), representing more than 15% of the total population – hence
the political views of the Russian immigrant community are not easily
brushed under the carpet. Their collective stance on the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict is credited with sweeping Avigdor
Lieberman and his Yisrael Beiteinu party into the upper echelons of
power at the last election, and on the strength of the latest poll from
the Israel Democracy Institute, it's not hard to see why Lieberman has
become the poster boy of the Russian right.
According to the survey, three out of four citizens of Russian
extraction support the transfer of Arabs out of Israel, an overwhelming
display of hostility towards the original inhabitants of the state in
which the Russians arrived a mere 20 years ago. On the face of it,
their antipathy towards their Arab neighbours could be chalked up to
the same inter-minority tensions prevalent around the world, such as
African-American resentment of Koreans and Mexicans in the US, or even
intra-minority antagonism, such as the shunning of Jewish immigrants to
Britain in the first half of the 20th century by those Jews already
long-established in the UK. In both cases, one group's feelings of
insecurity about their own status in society foments bitterness towards
others in a similar situation, and given the discrimination Russian
immigrants have suffered at the hands of the wider Israeli populace, it
isn't hard to apply the same logic here.
However, when viewed in the context of the attitudes of non-Russian
Israelis, it becomes clear that while the FSU immigrants' opinions are
undoubtedly hardline, the rest of Israel doesn't lag far behind –
revealing just how wide the gulf is between mainstream Israeli public
opinion and any kind of equitable and just settlement with the
Palestinians. Over half of the Israeli Jews polled support the transfer
of Arabs out of Israel, while 48% oppose any kind of retreat from
settlements (compared with 64% of Russian interviewees). Such figures
throw a spanner in the works of peace negotiations, since such
ingrained nationalism gives carte blanche to Israeli leaders to take
unyielding positions on the conflict if anything short of total
acquiescence is offered by the Palestinian side.
There are those on the Palestinian side who display equally
intransigent and unpalatable views on a final resolution, demanding
Israel be rid of its Jewish presence and handed back to the
Palestinians, and they deserve to be castigated just as much as the
pro-transfer majority in Israel. However, their direct impact on the
political process is minimal, since by and large all major decisions
taken by Israel are enacted on a unilateral basis, despite opposition
from either the Palestinian authorities or foreign governments.
The longer such unreconstructed attitudes persist in Israeli society,
the harder it becomes to remove the calcified layer of mistrust and
hostility so prevalent in Israeli minds. In a country where over half
of the dominant ethnic group wishes to expel those of a different
racial profile, the goalposts have shifted so far as to render standard
political groupings almost irrelevant. What would pass as rightwing
thinking in western countries is deemed simply middle-of-the-road in
Israel; anyone who would occupy the centre ground in more enlightened
countries is portrayed as a radical leftist here, sidelined to the
point of obscurity and their party's views paid not the slightest heed
by the man on the street.
On one level, it appears insane that a group of straight-off-the-boat
immigrants such as the FSU olim should call overwhelmingly for
displacing a group of fellow citizens who've been here for generations
– but when considered against the raison d'etre of the Jewish state,
their position becomes far easier to understand. However, to understand
is not to excuse, and the core malaise at the heart of Israeli society
is the unswerving belief that Israel has to be forever populated by a
Jewish majority, and that only those of the right extraction qualify to
stand at the state's helm and chart its course.
It is wholly immoral to demand that any racial group willingly roll
over, play dead, and allow themselves to be subjugated by another
people – as we Jews know firsthand, and have railed against throughout
our history. Yet that is exactly what Israel's leaders assert must
happen here and they have massive support from the electorate thanks to
their ability to whip up the masses into a decades-old nationalistic
frenzy.
Thus, the phenomenon of the racist Russian sector is deplorable, but
not wildly out of kilter with the popular attitudes among Israel's
Jewish population. Headlines might have focused on the Russian response
to the poll, but missing the wood for the trees just perpetuates the
underlying erosion taking place throughout Israeli society.
Likewise, blaming the Palestinians for simply refusing to accept that
they deserve to be transferred, trampled and traded out of their
heritage is a shameful path to tread. Their extremists aren't blameless
for exacerbating the hostilities between the two sides, but that
doesn't reduce in the slightest the validity of their claims to their
homeland.
The only solution is for sectarianism to be sidelined and for all
people of the region to be dealt with on a level playing field; whether
that means one state or two depends on the terms of the settlement, but
whatever settlement is reached must treat every concerned party as
equal. However, given the dominant thinking on the Israeli street, such
pipe dreams are as unlikely to become reality as ever before – Russians
or no Russians, Israeli society is dooming itself and its neighbours to
a future of conflict while such rank prejudice prevails.