- Details
-
Written by Robert Naiman, National Coordinator of Just Foreign Policy Robert Naiman, National Coordinator of Just Foreign Policy
-
Category: News News
-
Published: 04 May 2009 04 May 2009
-
Last Updated: 04 May 2009 04 May 2009
-
Created: 04 May 2009 04 May 2009
-
Hits: 3539 3539
Some may say: public opinion doesn't matter. What matters, they may
say, is that the so-called "Israel Lobby" will effectively punish any
politician who tries to shift U.S. policy towards Israel and the
Palestinians.
But the Obama Administration has already proved that this isn't necessarily so.
The Los Angeles Times reports:
The administration has asked Congress for minor changes in U.S. law
that would permit aid to continue flowing to Palestinians in the event
Hamas-backed officials become part of a unified Palestinian government.
Secretary of State Clinton defended the administration's position before Congress. She noted that
the United States supports and funds the Lebanese government, even
though it includes members of Hezbollah, another militant group on the
U.S. terrorist list.
Reps. Nita Lowey and Mark Kirk objected. But as the Jewish Telegraphic Agency notes,
Significantly, however, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz (D-Fla.), a
pro-Israel stalwart, defended Clinton in a call organized by the
National Jewish Democratic Council to mark the first 100 days of the
Obama administration.
"The unity government itself will have embraced those principles,"
she said. "The most important priority for members of Congress is to
support Israel and to move the peace process forward."
If the Obama Administration can shift U.S. policy towards engaging in
some form with Hamas, then surely it can shift policy towards moving
the U.S. from ineffective to effective implementation of its stated
policy of opposition to Israeli settlement expansion, as it is
virtually universally recognized that stopping Israeli settlement
expansion is an absolutely necessary element of achieving a two-state
solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict - just as it is virtually
universally recognized that some form of engagement with Hamas will be
necessary to achieve a two-state solution in the long run, and to get
effective aid into Gaza in the short run.
Moreover, if the U.S. would get serious about stopping Israeli
settlement expansion, it could help fundamentally alter the political
dynamics in Israel. Israel's right-wing has grown accustomed to the
notion that Israel can indefinitely go through the motions of a "peace
process," while steadily expanding settlements in the West Bank in the
hopes of making a Palestinian state impossible. If the U.S. puts an end
to this game, it will empower the political forces in Israel who
genuinely want a two-state solution - who, on this question, represent
the majority of the Israeli population.