- Details
-
Written by Aluf Benn Aluf Benn
-
Category: News News
-
Published: 08 April 2009 08 April 2009
-
Last Updated: 08 April 2009 08 April 2009
-
Created: 08 April 2009 08 April 2009
-
Hits: 3588 3588
The message that administration officials have relayed to the
congressmen is that President Obama is committed to the security of
Israel and intends to continue the military assistance agreement that
was signed by his predecessor, George W. Bush.
However, Obama considers the two-state solution central to his Middle
East policy, as he reiterated during a speech in Turkey on Monday, and
he intends to ask that Netanyahu fulfill all the commitments made by
previous governments in Israel: accepting the principle of a
Palestinian state; freezing settlement activity; evacuating illegal
outposts; and providing economic and security assistance to the
Palestinian Authority.
Administration officials made it clear to congressmen that the
Palestinians will also be required to fulfill their obligations in line
with the road map and the Annapolis process.
According to the reports received in Israel, the U.S. administration is
not concerned about recent statements by Foreign Minister Avigdor
Lieberman calling for a rejection of the Annapolis process or overtures
made by Netanyahu during the election campaign.
U.S. officials say they will wait and hear Netanyahu's position from
the prime minister himself when he meets Obama in Washington next month.
No hurry to play mediator
The Obama administration is also not opposed to the resumption of
negotiations between Israel and Syria but will insist that the Syrian
track not be used in Jerusalem as a way of evading obligations
undertaken by Israel as part of the Annapolis process.
Obama is in no hurry to bring the U.S. in as lead mediator between
Israel and Syria. American involvement, which both Israel and Syria
consider essential for substantive progress, will remain conditional on
progress in the dialogue between Washington and Damascus.
Regarding Iran, the Obama administration is preparing the ground for a
policy distinguishing between Iran's right to have nuclear technology,
including uranium enrichment done under international supervision, and
the actual building of a nuclear weapon.